We’ve collected more than 6 million data points on how people approach a challenge. Our research shows that to solve a complex challenge, you need four different types of thinking. But most of us prefer just one. And we avoid people who think differently. Teamwork dries up. Business results suffer.
People who like to clarify… want to understand the problem.
People who like to ideate… want to imagine the possibilities.
People who like to develop… want to work out the perfect solution.
People who like to implement… want to jump into action.
When teams learn to manage their preferences, they deliver better results.
By helping teams identity their individual and group preferences, the FourSight system helps people see their preferred approach to problem-solving. Then, we deliver tools and coaching to help teams manage their preferences for better collaboration and better results.
FourSight was founded by two PhD’s who are experts in the science of critical and creative thinking. The FourSight theory and problem-solving framework have been validated by more than two dozen published academic studies, conducted by FourSight team members as well as independent researchers around the globe.
Check out these case studies to see the power of FourSight in action.
The beauty giant transformed team outcomes with this team challenge program in Australia.
Read the Case Study
With its new course “Innovate Like an Entrepreneur,” UPS delivered innovation skills to marketing teams and focused employees’ problem solving skills on real UPS challenges.
Read the Case Study
Independent research conducted by a legendary inventor at IBM compared team structures and discovered the best way to train and sustain an innovative team.
Read the Case Study